Haldiram wrote: ↑Mon Aug 06, 2018 12:45 pm
Because WB perceives it as Bongal Kheda Part II
Read what Bongal Kheda was/is, this should help you make slightly more educated posts.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bongal_Kheda
For even more educated posts, I suggest that you read the history of this geographical region from 1826 till date.
Cute. Why did you mention only these riots, why not other riots? Why start history in 1940, 1900 or 1800 or 1000 or 1AD or 200 BC...? Like you gave the example of anti-Bengali riots in Assam, one can easily pull the nonsense Bengalis pulled on other regions; causing even bigger damage to Bharatiya Interests in long term.
This is nothing but happily walking into the trap of BIF forces.
When it comes to Bharat, the moment someone says "read history from my region point of view" it means they are prejudiced and deracinated. Only a prejudiced mind reads history from such "selective" timelines and frames of reference; that too reading from english translations or even by the "celebrated" historians of colonial era.
Since you wanted to know "history of Bangla" I will give you REAL history.
Per Bhagavata 9th skanda (9-685), a king called "Bali" (not that Bali punished by Vamana-avatar) divided his kingdom into six parts and gave it to his six sons (1) Anga (2) Vanga (3) Kalinga (4) Sumhma (5) Pundra and (6) Aandhra. This Bali belongs to 15th lineage (not 15th generation) of Anuvu, who was son of Yayati (his story comes in Maha Bharata, Aadi Parva. Read it, you will get some self-awareness).
Per one model of Yuga calculations, these kings lived 3,10,31,000 Years ago. If you have any history knowledge about Bengal beyond that timeline; please teach me.
Since then, many kings have ruled Bharat in different regions under different Chakravartis of their respective eras. These kingdoms expanded, contracted and decimated based on the capability and karma of those kings.
As part of this living history, Bharatiyas moved around Akhand Bharat and beyond freely because they all shared same Dharma, root language Sanskrit and root Bharatiya civilization. Due to this, any part of Bharat can claim "historical" ownership/belonging with any region in Akhand Bharat.
Per this logic, if Bengalis can claim ownership/relationship with Assam, so can Tamilians claim ownership on West Bengal using Chola empire.
***
I dont know what you wanted me to learn from your cryptic message.
If you are suggesting that Assam is known to have anti-Bengal feelings then isn't it better for WB to cooperate with Assam's NRC and ensure that REAL Bengalis are safe? The news article I posted above doesn't indicate that WB Govt is doing that.
Instead, the WB Govt is more worried about the BD illigals offering them sanctuary and threatening rest of Bharat with civil-war.
Do you guys even know how Bharat can crush a civil war? Bengali Hindus suffered a lot just facing Bengali Muslims. Imagine Bengali Dhimmis getting crushed by Bengali Muslims on one side and Bharatiya might on the other side. Such Bhadralok stupidity will end the Bengal (as we know it; because the islamic bengal is fast being Arabized) once and for all.