In 1947, an aggrieved community or "a separate nation" as they called themselves took more than their fair share of India's land and walked out with the avowed intention of establishing a "land of the pure"vishvak wrote: ↑Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:09 amWhere are we going with this crap. In democracy Muslims who had to not be secular went to pakilands.you can't just wish them away.
How come that question comes up again in democracy - it's because of votebanks that are based on religion. In other words, due to effect of religion, democracy is reduced to religious sleight of hand to deceive heatheins pegeins koofr.
Why this - not Modi but.. presume RaGa as junoidhari ul-ta- certified .. kind of argument. People have already clearly stated how it's just for votes even when in certain part he is called born Christian for votes. Why overlook all the arguments above just to turn around some questions.If there was a PM candidate who was a clone of Modi but not Hindu and he was running against RaGa (assume here for a minute that he is a certified Hindu). Who would you vote for?
they purposely left behind a ghazwa e hind entity in India, after they had taken their share and departed because that was what their adharmic and desert cult demanded.
What is left behind is not something to be shared or sliced up like a pie or some cake with every adharmic and cultish joker who today stands up screaming and claiming inequality and screaming that his share be once again delivered to him, essentially another share, in a land that was once divided now belongs to the other with whom they claimed that they could never coexist.
That share has been duly delivered, the nation has been cruelly vivisected, and yet we are somehow still liable to look after these goons and mollycoddle them in the name of minorities??
emboldened by this lax attitude of the dharmics, another strident minority with open offshore support is raising its adharmic and desert cult head, looking for another parting of ways as also another vivisection as evidenced in its activities in TN, AP, KER, eelam and the NE.
While the parsis and some tribes in the andaman island chain and suchlike may truly be considered minorities because of a very distinctive genetic diversity, how is the minority tag even applied to groups who have an identical genetic makeup, a larger cultural commonality, as well as linguistic association and affiliation, shared ancestry of tens of thousands of years with the so called majority??
These very "minorities" are existing in much larger numbers globally than the so called majority in India and they have a huge support of money, influence and political support used mainly to subvert, convert, suppress and wrest even more "rights" for themselves, the very same "rights" denied the Hindus in their own adharmic and cult following lands.
Its high time that we redifined the word minority and accorded reciprocal facilities and recognition to these cults as they do for Hindus resident in their countries.
Except for truly minority cases like the parsis etc, people in this geographic location and region simply and culturally Identify themselves as Hindus without covert or even overt religious bias. They should keep their religion at home and behave like Indians.